Everyone wants this child to get whatever support and privacy she needs. One side also wants to force her ten-year-old body to birth a baby. Her identity has not actually been disclosed, as demonstrated by the fact that you are calling her "Ohio abortion girl" and not her name. This is not "both sides."
Everyone wants this child to get whatever support and privacy she needs. One side also wants to force her ten-year-old body to birth a baby. Her identity has not actually been disclosed, as demonstrated by the fact that you are calling her "Ohio abortion girl" and not her name. This is not "both sides."
I genuinely have no idea what someone could find revolting about drawing attention to the fact that a raped ten year old was unable to access an abortion. I am also not sure how someone can be neutral about whether a raped ten year old should have access to abortion.
It's not as though forcing her to give birth at ten is going to protect her privacy. A nine-months-pregnant fourth grader is going to get noticed at school.
Everyone wants this child to get whatever support and privacy she needs. One side also wants to force her ten-year-old body to birth a baby. Her identity has not actually been disclosed, as demonstrated by the fact that you are calling her "Ohio abortion girl" and not her name. This is not "both sides."
I guess it depends on which side you’re on. I’m on neither and I find both revolting in this case. I guess we’ll have to agree to disagree.
I genuinely have no idea what someone could find revolting about drawing attention to the fact that a raped ten year old was unable to access an abortion. I am also not sure how someone can be neutral about whether a raped ten year old should have access to abortion.
It's not as though forcing her to give birth at ten is going to protect her privacy. A nine-months-pregnant fourth grader is going to get noticed at school.