Hehe love your question. I guess the pro-foreskin people say that the foreskin collects and holds the woman's natural lubrication better. But I don't know how this can help unless he's pulling out all the way out before going back in? I dunno. Seems like a silly argument, if there are lubrication issues, what's wrong with using extra lube from a bottle? Lots of people do that.
Hehe love your question. I guess the pro-foreskin people say that the foreskin collects and holds the woman's natural lubrication better. But I don't know how this can help unless he's pulling out all the way out before going back in? I dunno. Seems like a silly argument, if there are lubrication issues, what's wrong with using extra lube from a bottle? Lots of people do that.
That's not it. there's no need for artificial lubrication because the tip of the penis, which is very sensitive, is protected by the foreskin so vaginal lubricant is sufficient for comfortable sex. Men also don't need any lube for masturbation.
Hehe love your question. I guess the pro-foreskin people say that the foreskin collects and holds the woman's natural lubrication better. But I don't know how this can help unless he's pulling out all the way out before going back in? I dunno. Seems like a silly argument, if there are lubrication issues, what's wrong with using extra lube from a bottle? Lots of people do that.
While I still don't fully get the mechanics of this explanation, it is less upsetting than the idea of the foreskin weeping natural lubrication.
...and if the woman's juices just aren't there, the foreskin trap has nothing to catch. Yes, just reach for the bottle of KY!
That's not it. there's no need for artificial lubrication because the tip of the penis, which is very sensitive, is protected by the foreskin so vaginal lubricant is sufficient for comfortable sex. Men also don't need any lube for masturbation.