I feel like the coverage of this controversy highlights why I couldn't live in Britain. Too easily excitable and stuffy. A lot to admire Europe for, but ultimately glad to be in America
I feel like the coverage of this controversy highlights why I couldn't live in Britain. Too easily excitable and stuffy. A lot to admire Europe for, but ultimately glad to be in America
It’s definitely a UK va US kind of issue. Laws are basically optional in most of the US in a way Europeans can’t really appreciate but that regularly demonstrates how futile more laws often are [here].
I can't speak for another poster but I think he's getting at this: in the US, we are generally reluctant to ban anything. We bend over backwards not to infringe on personal freedom or property rights.
Witness the debates over gun rights. We have a libertarian streak that may not be as prevalent in Europe. I can't imagine any US jurisdiction successfully enacting a breed ban, no matter how many attacks occur
America is big, in most places there aren’t very many cops, and as a result people’s first thought is not “is this illegal and will I get caught?” Speaking in broad strokes.
State jurisdictions also vary widely and so a nationwide campaign is much more difficult - you don’t just need to persuade a majority, you need to persuade a majority in each state.
It has pros and cons, I’m personally quite pro-pit-ban in theory, but it would be pointless to pursue a nationwide campaign for a ban even if you planned to go state by state, because there will always be holdouts. In the UK you can be one and done.
I didn’t say it was a uniformly good thing! Just that it’s very different. But luckily I don’t think the UK is deporting people to the US by force so you should be okay.
I feel like the coverage of this controversy highlights why I couldn't live in Britain. Too easily excitable and stuffy. A lot to admire Europe for, but ultimately glad to be in America
It’s definitely a UK va US kind of issue. Laws are basically optional in most of the US in a way Europeans can’t really appreciate but that regularly demonstrates how futile more laws often are [here].
I'm more on team USA, mainly because I can't believe that people in the UK have police come to their homes over tweets.
I haven't thought of it that way. Could you develop what you mean by that ?
I can't speak for another poster but I think he's getting at this: in the US, we are generally reluctant to ban anything. We bend over backwards not to infringe on personal freedom or property rights.
Witness the debates over gun rights. We have a libertarian streak that may not be as prevalent in Europe. I can't imagine any US jurisdiction successfully enacting a breed ban, no matter how many attacks occur
America is big, in most places there aren’t very many cops, and as a result people’s first thought is not “is this illegal and will I get caught?” Speaking in broad strokes.
State jurisdictions also vary widely and so a nationwide campaign is much more difficult - you don’t just need to persuade a majority, you need to persuade a majority in each state.
It has pros and cons, I’m personally quite pro-pit-ban in theory, but it would be pointless to pursue a nationwide campaign for a ban even if you planned to go state by state, because there will always be holdouts. In the UK you can be one and done.
Most Brits are glad they don’t live in America, you know, what with the news stories we see about you.
I didn’t say it was a uniformly good thing! Just that it’s very different. But luckily I don’t think the UK is deporting people to the US by force so you should be okay.
Not surprised. Figure there's a reason you all don't leave your immaculate little island. It's a big scary world out there