And so what if he is? You are still more upset about WHO is talking about the mass rapes and HOW they are talking about it, than you are about the horrifying fact that Pakistani gangs raped thousands of British girls. Who gives a shit about that, as long as no one is talking about it for the wrong reasons, hmmm?
And so what if he is? You are still more upset about WHO is talking about the mass rapes and HOW they are talking about it, than you are about the horrifying fact that Pakistani gangs raped thousands of British girls. Who gives a shit about that, as long as no one is talking about it for the wrong reasons, hmmm?
Have you considered running for public office in Britain? Seems like you’re exactly the kind of person they want!
Let me give a concrete example. When you listened to Jesse's detailed examination of the Jacob Blake shooting, why did you not think "this doesn't matter, the inaccurate reporting was drawing attention to the issue of unjustified police shootings"? Why did you not think "Jesse is more interested in WHO is talking about the police, not misuse of deadly force"? Why are you okay with accuracy and context (or as Jesse calls it "nuance") when talking about police shootings in the US, but not about grooming gangs in the UK?
Are you seriously asking me to explain, TO YOU, why I subscribe to this podcast? Do you think that's any of your fucking business, Andrew?
Do you think I need to justify it to you, a malcontented nerd who is peeing your little pants because Elon did problematic tweets? You, a person who seems genuinely seems more upset about THAT, than what happened to those girls?
And so what if he is? You are still more upset about WHO is talking about the mass rapes and HOW they are talking about it, than you are about the horrifying fact that Pakistani gangs raped thousands of British girls. Who gives a shit about that, as long as no one is talking about it for the wrong reasons, hmmm?
Have you considered running for public office in Britain? Seems like you’re exactly the kind of person they want!
How have you ended up subscribed to BARPOD if you think it's sinister to object to internet bullshit?
Sweet pea, I’ve been a Primo subscriber and member of the Barpod community since 2020.
Why? If you think preferring accuracy on a highly emotive issue indicates bad motives, then what's the point?
Let me give a concrete example. When you listened to Jesse's detailed examination of the Jacob Blake shooting, why did you not think "this doesn't matter, the inaccurate reporting was drawing attention to the issue of unjustified police shootings"? Why did you not think "Jesse is more interested in WHO is talking about the police, not misuse of deadly force"? Why are you okay with accuracy and context (or as Jesse calls it "nuance") when talking about police shootings in the US, but not about grooming gangs in the UK?
Are you seriously asking me to explain, TO YOU, why I subscribe to this podcast? Do you think that's any of your fucking business, Andrew?
Do you think I need to justify it to you, a malcontented nerd who is peeing your little pants because Elon did problematic tweets? You, a person who seems genuinely seems more upset about THAT, than what happened to those girls?
I just wondered what you get out of it, given that you seem at odds with its entire ethos.