The article I linked (and first read) got it wrong and I continued to dig and found the correct source. (below is paraphrased from that thread)
-------------
But I found this Atlantic article referencing about the same numbers...BUT phrased differently. And probably identifies where the Aspen Project reporter got it wrong
The article I linked (and first read) got it wrong and I continued to dig and found the correct source. (below is paraphrased from that thread)
-------------
But I found this Atlantic article referencing about the same numbers...BUT phrased differently. And probably identifies where the Aspen Project reporter got it wrong
They say 30% of white kids play, while 44% of black kids play tackle football. It's the proportion of each that plays, not the proportion of players as in the first article.
*edit*
Regardless, from your response it's clear you're an asshole.
The article I linked (and first read) got it wrong and I continued to dig and found the correct source. (below is paraphrased from that thread)
-------------
But I found this Atlantic article referencing about the same numbers...BUT phrased differently. And probably identifies where the Aspen Project reporter got it wrong
https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2019/02/football-white-flight-racial-divide/581623/#
They say 30% of white kids play, while 44% of black kids play tackle football. It's the proportion of each that plays, not the proportion of players as in the first article.
*edit*
Regardless, from your response it's clear you're an asshole.